围绕人工智能泡沫的争论归结为一个问题：AI实验室的收入增长是否足够快，以支撑大规模的数据中心建设？

在这个大问题之下，衍生出许多小问题。例如，采购的人工智能芯片在生产环境中能保持多久的实用性？四年、六年还是八年，这些不同的时间跨度会极大地改变计算结果。但最重要的问题是，企业是否从人工智能中获得了足够的实际价值，从而继续购买更多产品，最好是以不断上涨的价格。迄今为止，这种投资回报无法在全经济层面得到证实，仅存在于个别案例之中。

人工智能是否能快速产生回报仍处于“微妙平衡”的状态

英国科技企业家、研究组织Exponential View的创始人阿齐姆·阿扎尔（Azeem Azhar）就提供了这样一个案例。在与《大西洋月刊》的尼古拉斯·汤普森（Nicholas Thompson）进行的一期非常值得收听的播客中，他描述了自己在拉斯维加斯与大约160位IT副总裁交谈的情景。阿扎尔询问谁能够指出可衡量的AI成果，三分之二的人依然站着。这比他预期的要多。随后他进一步追问，谁的结果好到足以打断首席执行官的夏季休假？只有大约八个人还站着。

阿扎尔的结论是，企业正在取得进展，但速度缓慢。这种速度是否足够快以证明当前投资水平的合理性，仍然是一个未解之谜。一些高管表示，在取得初步胜利后，他们的董事会变得更加雄心勃勃。即使在意大利这样增长较慢的市场，阿扎尔也从首席执行官那里听到，尽管过程中出现了一些失误，但信任感正在建立，预算也在增加。

与此同时，许多公司正从昂贵的前沿模型转向开放权重（open-weight）的替代方案。在这种情况下，人工智能的使用量可能会增长，但由于回流用于资助建设的资金不足，泡沫仍可能破裂。

阿扎尔指出了他所谓的“看跌版本的故事”。波士顿咨询公司的一项调查发现，全球约70%的首席执行官表示，AI的成功关系到他们在职务中的形象，这促使他们描绘出一幅比现实更乐观的画面。阿扎尔强调，他对人工智能泡沫问题也没有简单的答案，目前的局势处于“微妙平衡”之中。

没有炒作的人工智能新闻——由人类策划

订阅THE DECODER，享受无广告阅读、每周AI通讯、每年六次的独家“AI雷达”前沿报告、完整档案访问权限以及评论板块的参与权。

立即订阅

The AI bubble debate boils down to one question: Is revenue at AI labs growing fast enough to pay for the massive data center buildout?

A lot of smaller questions hang off that big one. How long can purchased AI chips stay useful in production, for instance? Four, six, or eight years changes the math a lot. But the most important question is whether companies are getting enough real value from AI to keep buying more of it, ideally at rising prices. So far, the return on investment can't be documented at an economy-wide level and only shows up in anecdotes.

Whether AI pays off fast enough remains "finely balanced"

Azeem Azhar, a British tech entrepreneur and founder of the research group Exponential View, offers such an anecdote. In a podcast well worth listening to with Nicholas Thompson of The Atlantic , he describes speaking to about 160 IT vice presidents in Las Vegas. Azhar asked who could point to measurable AI results. Two-thirds stayed standing. That was more than he expected. Then he pushed further and asked who has results good enough to interrupt the CEO's summer vacation. Only about eight people remained on their feet.

Azhar's takeaway is that companies are making progress, but slowly. Whether that pace is fast enough to justify current investment levels remains an open question. Some executives say their boards are growing more ambitious after early wins. Even in slower markets like Italy, Azhar heard from CEOs that trust is building and budgets are rising despite missteps along the way.

At the same time, many companies are shifting away from expensive frontier models toward open-weight alternatives. In that scenario, AI usage might grow, but the bubble could still burst because not enough money flows back to fund the buildout.

Azhar points to what he calls the "bear version of the story." A Boston Consulting Group survey found that about 70 percent of CEOs worldwide say AI success matters for how they're perceived in their roles, giving them an incentive to paint a rosier picture than reality warrants. Azhar stresses that he doesn't have a simple answer to the AI bubble question either and that the situation is "finely balanced."

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans

Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.

Subscribe now